I was hoping to save enough money for a Sphynx cylinder this summer but that's not going to happen, so now I'm trying to decide between a Pro-X 330 (non-power valve for both) and the ESR 330 (not the bolt on kit). I was hoping for some informed opinions on the two before I spend 800 bucks or thereabouts. I'm interested in quality, performance potential, reliability, etc.
I'm leaning towards the Pro-X out of concern for the reliability of the ESR, although I gather their reliability has improved in recent years and I'd like to support ESR as he supports us.
I'm also wondering about the effects of different crank options, i.e., short rod, long rod, and +4. My goal is to build an engine that likes to rev--I prefer rev over torque--so I'm thinking the short rod is the way to go. However, I've read that the "square" engine you get with the +4 crank is a great motor, but that it requires a lot more porting because the cylinder wasn't designed for a stoker crank.
Finally--and I know there are a lot of factors involve--but generally what kind of hp numbers can a person expect out of a 330? I'm thinking mid 50s? Thanks.
I'm leaning towards the Pro-X out of concern for the reliability of the ESR, although I gather their reliability has improved in recent years and I'd like to support ESR as he supports us.
I'm also wondering about the effects of different crank options, i.e., short rod, long rod, and +4. My goal is to build an engine that likes to rev--I prefer rev over torque--so I'm thinking the short rod is the way to go. However, I've read that the "square" engine you get with the +4 crank is a great motor, but that it requires a lot more porting because the cylinder wasn't designed for a stoker crank.
Finally--and I know there are a lot of factors involve--but generally what kind of hp numbers can a person expect out of a 330? I'm thinking mid 50s? Thanks.