I will try and answer all the questions I can.Awesome ikas glad you joined the site!! Lots of curiosity on the W-Tec, hopefully you can help answer some questions regarding its construction. That lightweight frame with a KX500 will be a beast! How does the W-Tec frame get away with all of these large single 2 strokes without vibrating it too pieces? These same motors in a 250r frame vibrate like crazy... Post up a link to you build or start on here!
Will try to make it happenWhen you going to bring this bike state-side so I can ride it... LOL!![]()
![]()
That build is nice! Followed it before on atvriders when you were building it like a elsinore replica.Did you mention Laeger Narrow?
Here's mine: Laeger Narrow front, CR500 Linkage rear, 496CC Saber Motor... all custom. This is my version of a TRX500R..
no,I have not seen this.It is not exactly what I had imagined. it looks like the shock angle is way wrong. as far as my desert sled goes ,its in pieces .every time I think Iwill get goin again ,one of my four boys cost me a ton of money for something
Dennis, yes I've seen a banshee, not sure if its the same one. I have pics of it somewhere. I think it was green and black if I remember correctly. There was another in DW not too long ago, 3-4 years athat was blue and grey. Similar setup.Troy, several months ago there was a Dean Sundahl framed banshee with that style of a arms on it at Sandtrax here in Tulsa. It had 18" of travel both front and rear and also got setup for dual LED lights(one on the frame and the other on the bars). It was cool as h_ll and looked like it would eat up some serious whoops. I don't normally care for banshees(used to have one) but this one was different LOL. Cool pics BTW. Pretty rare to see a banshee with his frame and A arms and even more rare to see a R with them. I never knew that Dean made an R frame with his A arm's. That's the 1st one I've EVER seen. After looking closer I guess it's not really a R(looks like a banshee radiator and I see the oil tank for a fourstroke I'm guessing). It's still cool and looks better with the R plastic instead of banshee plastic.
Yes I will be using FEA, I also have my own personal SoMat field computer for data aquisition, (hand-me-down, from work...LOL!) so I can directly measure the stress at the weld toe and correlate that to a fatigue estimate. I plan on building a rear grab bar that I can mount the SoMat too and record real-time data and feed that into my laptop.. As far as, FEA, I only personally have access to ProMechanica, which is marginal at best. Really need to use IDEAS or Ansys for more acurate FEA.yes troy. instant center of rotation; in this specific application its our "roll center" that is needing comparison of the two suspension types.
troy, will you be using finite element analysis in your frame/chassis design?
the sundahl suspension is unique. it seems more for high speed straight line stuff. there is alot of mass to deal with. it would definitely need some work to make it balanced.
john
Went back and looked again, I think you're right its just a pivot joint not a ball joint, so the camber would follow a single path and not change, so it would depending on what angle that is setup at from intial design. I was thinking it was a lower ball joint like we use. If so, then you could use an extra control links to control camber, thru its articulation. This could be an improvement on this existing design. But that ball joint would need to be hell-for-stout.Im not sure but it looks like the lower attch.for the spindle isn't on a ball joint.it almost has to be a swing joint (only moves forward and backwards) I was thinking that the upper links frame mounting point would be placed were the caster would stay the same thru out the travel. these two things make me believe that the camber doesn't change